Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMQD versus STATE

The complainant and his two accomplices, who praised the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 evidence, claimed that they saw the accused beating the victim and that the accused fled on the spot after injuring the victim. Or the arrest of the complainant and the two other witnesses on the occasion of their presence could not be done in this most unnatural way, it cannot be believed that the extent of the prosecution's testimony was incredible. Was made because of an alleged memo recovered from discussions and consultations in connection with Hatchet's recovery. The exact date did not show the date of its recovery from the place where the alleged Hatcht was allegedly recovered, was an open space and accessible to other persons on such recovery. Can't be relied on as an ocular account of the motive and the number of casualties in the fatalities contradicts the medical evidence. An independent witness did not have the prosecution presented by the prosecution because he, beyond any doubt, failed to prove the accused, the trial court released him after the conviction. Had issued instructions for. when you need a advocate from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer