Find a Lawyer

HAMID versus THE STATE

The complainant and other prosecution witnesses were known before the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/324/148/149/109 accused of defining evidence which was immediately named in the FIR filed , And there was no reason for the false chances / misidentification, especially when the light bulb was operating at the time of the incident, the suspect was declared a fatal injury but none other than the co-accused. Was not hurt in the case of the accused was related to the accused and the trial court was truly acquitted by giving detailed reasons. In order to give the accused the benefit of the doubt, the prosecution set up their case against the accused through an ocular account of the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses, all of whom stood the test for long and relied on their statements. The relationship of the prosecution witnesses with was not sufficient. To discredit their testimony when they were otherwise material and truthful. The witnesses and their evidence were motivated by medical evidence as well as by the trial court for the offense to be prosecuted. Cannot be interrupted immigration advocates contact from Kurram Agency lawyer