The Special Relief Act, 1877, provided the plaintiff with evidence on record that the plaintiff had acquired the property in dispute by transfer to his original owner, and that the defendant did not prove his alleged adverse possession. The plaintiff, who had proved his title in relation to the suit property, was entitled to possession of the property by his original owner, who claimed that It cannot be approved and allowed to be retaliated by negative ownership. On the one hand, requesting a valid title in respect of the suit property and on the other side the negative possession at the same time, on the other hand the decision passed in favor of the plaintiff by the appellate court and the interference by the High Court in its use. Can't do Editing Jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
