Find a Lawyer

MST. MUSSARAT ARA KHANNUM versus UMAID ALI

Specific relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for performance of land sale agreement, the Supreme Court upheld this appeal Allowed to consider whether this wrong decision was given in the wrong places of law and facts and was also the result of not reading material pieces of evidence to prove the applicant's claim and misrepresentation ? Whether the issue of permission to withdraw an appeal and then the entertainment of a revision application was illegal in view of the value of this case and consequently, that decision was without jurisdiction and no legal authority whatsoever Had no effect, even though both the applicant and the defendant were required after holding. Appealing to pay court fees on the cost of this case can be considered a time restriction. In view of the history of the matter, however, this was a fitting case for delayed concession, mainly due to the good impression and belief that the appeal should be filed before the High Court. When the appeal was dismissed by the Additional District Judge, he excluded the appeal on the basis of limitations, whether the evidence that came on record was appreciated in the higher view. Regardless of what aspect of the matter escapes the notice of the High Court, the absence of consideration and the implications of the sale can be imposed. Whether the calculation made by the appellate court over time and relied upon by the High Court is a record liability and justifies the consumption of time between the applicant's specific dates. best law firms from Dhirkot lawyer