Find a Lawyer

SARDAR BEGUM versus CH. MUHAMMAD SAEED

The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 47, 38 96 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 12 passed two sets of decrees applying the principle of integration for the specific performance of the contract for sale. Went to which time was set. O IX, R 6, against the third set of defendants under CPC, against the second set of defendants, against one set by the defendants, and against the date of the date of the second order, the balance remaining. In the same way, the deadline for submitting the remaining amount was at that time, however, the request for one of the defendants was set aside for the separation of the former party decree, further amending and civil. There was a case of applying. Appeal to the Supreme Court for leave, which was finally ruled on 11 3 1990, that the limitation of filing the execution petition would be the rule of consolidation of the decree, applicable in this regard, 20 12 1980. According to the decree in which the principle of merger was applied which led to the application of the principle of merger which was found to be in the range of execution, the defendant was enforceable against the other. The former party's decree passed from 20 to 1980 was set aside against those against which the former party decree was passed on 29 6 1985, the apex court further pointed out. The court ruled and dealt with the appeal, because of the principle of merger, the application of the order dated 20, 1980 was not barred and the Supreme Court on the execution of that order. To decide more questions stated advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer