Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 13D Evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 praised the suspect's personal search of four live bullets with his magazine in the recovery of a 30-ton KT pistol when he left an abandoned place in the strange hours of the night. Was going on, the presence of private advisers at the time of the recovery was beyond question, the police had no enmity with the accused in a false case with the accused. Did not need. The prosecution's witnesses did not suggest that the pistol presented to the court was not in working condition and that the recovery itself was denied, arguing that the pistol was neither sealed nor seized. Was in working condition that did not require a license. Even if its order is over, it should still remain in its possession. In the present case the conviction and punishment of the accused were maintained ask a advocate free from Chawinda lawyer