Find a Lawyer

FARZAND ALI versus THE STATE

Defining the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 353/34, the ocular testimony did not indicate any indication of the commission's involvement in the crime and the FIR did not explain the character of the accused. The presence and absence of an identity parade in this case has severely damaged the potential value of molecular evidence. The evidence was inconsistent with the accused's guilt and unable to explain to any other reasonable speculation, except that the confessional statement of his crime was not accurate, neither voluntary, nor legally recorded nor He was found fit in the present case, on the day of the incident against the accused on the occasion of being acquitted of guilt and exporting the rifle after three years' interval by the accused's mamas and sending their plea by the Ballistic Expert. For a while the notable felony has not been proved but has never been able to prove the prosecution's case, which is most seriously understood as a charge. Evidence to be taken and the accused was acquitted in circumstances ask a advocate free from Takhtbai lawyer