Find a Lawyer

WARD ALI KHAN DURANI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 154 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the third FIR of the deceased, registered before the widow of two women Were not satisfied with AR. He felt that the FI rupees did not reflect the facts. The first and the IR was registered at the behest of a police officer, who had accused the widows themselves of registering their second FIR in the case. Of the widows who were still in police custody, the widow's confession that the two facts filed by the police were not affected by the fact was not irrational. The widow of the deceased filed a constitutional petition before the High Court. I have been directed by the concerned police to record another FIR disclosure. Accepting the petition, the High Court directed the police to file a third FIR, which was requested by the widow of the widow, saying there was no hard and fast rule that another FIR was registered. Don't be If the information given to police officers who disclosed another crime to the same police officer was also considered by the police, unless it merely justified the first version, it must be recorded by the police if the two former If the FI rupees did not reflect the true facts in connection with the incident, refusal to record the actual version of the incident could not be considered an alternative step, even though the complaint was provided to the aggrieved party by the law, But just for the fact that no alternative was provided, in any appropriate case, e advocate for immigration from Lalamusa lawyer