Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Testimony of Evidence Both the prosecution witnesses who were police officers were on duty at the scene of the incident and the accused did not dispute the presence of the witnesses as the prosecution witnesses there also proved that Prosecution witnesses indicated. The suspect tried to stop the bus she was on, but instead the accused accelerated the bus and struck her, killing her, resulting in her death. The ocular testimony presented by the prosecution's witnesses was consistent, convincing and they confirmed each other on all of the prosecution's witnesses, who were natural and truthful witnesses, their version was supported by circumstantial evidence. The witnesses said that the accused had no qualms against the accused nor was there any reason to replace him with the real culprit nor was the incident in the name of the accused and the number of his bus operated by him. Was specifically mentioned in the FIR and the Met immediately suspected the prosecution's witnesses reported to the police. Yes, but they stopped the investigation on all material and related aspects, the ocular testimony of the prosecution witnesses had full support to the material details from other independent pieces of evidence and the circumstances of this case were fully corroborated. The statements of the defense witnesses were not affected by the trust and they did not receive any support from the record; the evidence on the record had fully proved that the accused had intentionally pushed the bus accelerator and killed the accused. Had caused death. Under section 2302 (b), PPC, convicted and convicted of murder best advocate from Gawadar lawyer