Find a Lawyer

BHATTI ICE FACTORY, BUCHEKE, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-C, LAHORE

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Sections 138, 136 and 62 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Maintaining a constitutional petition was referred to the Commissioner of Income Tax under the jurisdiction of inquiry under review of individual income received from an ice factory. Diagnostic framing may be approved without notice. After hearing the section 62, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, insufficient melt allowance and excessive request of GP Rate Revenue Authority, the High Court refused to interfere with its constitutional petition. That many questions were raised about the law. With regard to the confirmation of the order of the amending authority, the question cannot be decided as to the amendment of the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court as there is no other remedy available against it. Which has been taken under all the principles of the Constitution. According to the application, the alleged offense referred to in the High Court's Appellate or Reference jurisdiction under the C Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was by Germany only in the context of the assessment order and review order for such matters. To do something that was not possible. To be decided in the exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution (applicant) it had two remedies available in a judicial aspect, including: Additional Commissioner (Appeal) and Appeal of Second Appeal. In the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and then in the High Court, a reference was also available to the ACC and finally the Supreme Court appealed to the Supreme Court against the order of reference reference. us immigration advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer