Find a Lawyer

AMANAT ALI versus DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE

Attempts to repeal the constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), 5 161 Corruption Prevention Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) terminating FIRF1R That the complainant had taken the oath. The affidavit complaining against the accused himself had complained against the accused himself and his statement was also filed, the currency notes printed by the magistrate were handed over to the complainant where the accused also came from and The money was received and raided accordingly. The accused, a police officer, had misused his official capacity to obtain the complainant's affidavit in his favor and tried to excuse himself from the commission of the crime. In the case of raids it was not enough to terminate the FIR, firstly because the affidavit is not a statement under section 161 or 164, CRPC, which is why quashing cannot be considered. FIR's NG; Secondly, the affidavit may be considered by the court only at the time of trial, when the complainant will be subjected to cross-examination by any party even recording the evidence. Even after the trial, if the complainant makes a statement in favor of the accused, the same can be ignored because the complainant closed the raid on the statement of Ounce. Was carrying out the arrangements, conditions will turn to explain how the accused that he had refused to remove fir, conditions patent advocate from Ukba lawyer