Find a Lawyer

ABID ALI versus SUPERINTENDENT, ADIALA JAIL, RAWALPINDI

Section 9 (a) (v) / 10 (a) of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 (AL V of 1860), Letters No. Section O (MP) of the Government of Chips XVI and XXI Punjab (MP) 2 8/99 2001, Dated 4 5 The Constitution of 2001 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution petition sought the release of the accused from the jail on the basis that he had completed the period of his reasonable sentence, including the amnesty available under the law. , But based on that, it was stopped. Letter 8 Section O (MP) 2 8/99 2001, dated 5-5 2001, issued by the Home Department, Government of Punjab, was adopted in Writ Petition No. 23185 of 1999 in compliance with the High Court decision, cases The approval of the amnesty under Chap XXI was discussed by the PPC High Court in Right Petition No. 23185 of 1999, therefore, the observations made in the said judgment are only fourth, concerning the human body under PPC. Crime will be limited. And not in any other case, the circular said, therefore, it was not applicable without any discrimination on all matters, as such accused could not be removed by a waiver management directive available under the law, which resulted in the writ petition. I was not in the memory of the decision given by the High Court. The CHIP will be applicable to offenses other than those committed under the Sixteenth, the PPC Circular is limited to offenses under CHAP XVI, therefore, the PPC is issued in compliance with the Supreme Court's prescribed law. Would be considered to be. The bargain High Court's constitutional petition dealt with the same observation best law firm from Islamabad lawyer