NUR MUHAMMAD versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SAMUNDRI
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional plea The magistrate failed to properly appreciate the documents presented by the applicant and expressed the misconception that the dispute The occupation of the store was handed over to the applicant. However, the Revenue Authority Sessions Court proceedings properly discussed all the evidence presented by both parties, and came to a final conclusion that the defendant's shop was occupied when it was sealed. It was fully supported by the KJ judge. On the other hand, depending on the PC documents by the applicants, under the PC documents, the respondents through the proceedings under Section 145 the dispute as a tenant in the shop and not being evicted from there. Cannot be deprived of their possession by the Did not establish possession of the shop when it was sealed, constitutional application was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
