Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.1851/LB OF 1999 versus I.T.A. NO.1851/LB OF 1999

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 66A & 59 (1) CBR Circular No. 4 of 1996, Dated 1 7 1996 CBR: Letter CN7 (4), Section Assistant 95 Deputy Commissioner's Review on Self-Assessment Workers Additional Commissioner's Inspection Options for Review / Welfare Fund Assessment completed under the Self Assessment Scheme was canceled by the Inspecting Additional Commissioner on the basis that the tax paid was calculated by adding it to the Workers Welfare Fund. As was the case and the mistake was accepted under the Self Assessment Scheme, the Idity Welfare Fund was not income taxed under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. So, and that tax comparison was a taxable expense, the last announced / reviewed Income Workers / Welfare Fund was not to be merged with the Additional Commissioner examining section 59 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1 The Sales Assessment Scheme was vacated anywhere to reap the benefits of the order. 979 was restored by the Appellate Tribunal immigration advocates phone number from Sudhnoti lawyer