Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAFFAR TARAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 302/307/148/149/109 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Article 12 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution was the same as the submission of the special court stage to the case when it The case was under trial before a special court established under the Anti-Terrorism Activities (1976) Act, where almost all the evidence of the Transfer Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was completed. As required in section 12 (3) of the said Act, the transfer court must proceed with the de novo trial and examine all the prosecution witnesses to defeat the purpose of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, The order, which ordered the hearing of the hate crimes, and the related cases or cases in which evidence of the trial is already listed by the trial court, did not, in any way, express prejudice to the accused. Has been and is no exception, therefore, the participant has followed the procedure adopted by the trial court for trial. It will go from where the trial was held by the trial court at the end of which the evidence was filed. The constitutional application was dismissed accordingly. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer