MUHAMMAD WARIS versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302 / evidence 34 The FIR was immediately filed for appreciation of the evidence and the names of the accused, the weapons and the role they played, were specifically mentioned in the incident. There was no sudden outrage. Although it was weak, the death penalty from the weakness of the objective hardly makes any difference, and the circumstances to deal with it could not be ascertained. Witnesses were closely related to the victim, but he had no hostility to be falsely implicated in the incident. After throwing light throughout the day, the question of misidentification did not arise. Witnesses have truthfully stated that the time period between the doctor's late death and post-mortem, together with the time of the incident. It was seen that the absence of vacancy by chance through medical evidence would not proceed to the accused's case as it may have been due to the rush of people who had assembled at the scene that the accused had brutally killed the victim. , Neither deserved any kind of relaxation nor was there any mitigating matter in his favor as far as the question of punishment is concerned Punished. The suspects were retained by fellow suspects, although they were armed with daggers and pistols, but they did not cause any injury to the victim and the sentence against the accompanying accused was dropped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Islamabad lawyer