Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus ABDUL HAQ

Sections 22 and 41 of the Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), the section 42 declaration that the property being vacated was Muslim property and the officers who had settled it as illegally evacuating non-Muslim property. Had been wrongly allotted, the plaintiff suspended the settlement order. The trial court returned the civil suit pursuant to the provisions of sections 22 and 41 of the Pakistan (Administration for Homeland) Act, 1957, and appealed after the High Appellate Court dismissed the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction. Was allowed and put aside the order passed by the Settlement Authorities in which the allotment order approved by the Settlement Authority was not proper and was not without jurisdiction, Sections 22 and 41 of Pakistan (Administration for Homeland) Act 1957 did not apply. Settlement authorities did not have the legal right to assign vacant property to the defendant in favor of the defendant, and the decision of the High Court of the High Court rightly defining the evidence as well as the Evoki / Settlement Rules. And this court was in accordance with the rules of the Supreme Court, which had no material irregularities or judicial errors. High Court's decision was taken notice of and did not demand interference by Supreme Court famous high court advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer