Find a Lawyer

ASIF ALI ZARDARI versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) summoning witnesses as judicial witnesses Has previously rejected the request. In order to allow a list of 25 witnesses, including nine witnesses, the prosecution sought a detailed order, mentioning that the order itself had been changed and that it had been told that the preceding order was legal. And was approved on a technical basis and the court, under section 404040, was eligible for the CCP. Call the nine witnesses as the prosecution witnesses because the trial court only granted the said order pursuant to the statements of those witnesses listed under Section 161, CRPC, which were not admissible in evidence and which Timing was also available. No new material to approve the earlier order was, thus, neither available to the trial court when the prosecution's witnesses had already examined the uncontested order in which the nine witnesses were referred. The inclusion of the evidence was also not disclosed and could not be anything other than filling in the millions found by their calling prosecutor at a later stage, calling section 4040, CRPC Transferring the petition under nine witnesses as court witnesses, afterwards, the trial court reported various observations on the same subject. That the intervention was sought and the High Court was exercising its amended jurisdiction to revoke an order which was not only invalid but not durable in law and the law criminal advocate from Gambet lawyer