Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL KHAN versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 16 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), In a case pending in section 555 Accountability Court, the accused examines all of the prosecution's witnesses to terminate proceedings under section 555A, CR PC. Was checked. The court and the case were settled for the statement of the accused and the defense, if an applicant requested in the petition that the High Court review and evaluate the evidence of the prosecution filed by the trial court, the applicant's confession is admissible. Not usually before the trial and detaining a competent jurisdiction in a trial court, and before a competent jurisdiction court finding that a preliminary case is being pursued against the applicant. So, this will not happen. In the interest of justice, substituting the inquiries by the High Court and emphasizing on the trial court that could never happen, they intended to preserve the hereditary jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 5A, CRPC, The law should be adopted in its usual way and the trial court is allowed to exercise its jurisdiction by law and then identify the merits. Proper review and review of the evidence of the prosecution already listed top advocate from Astore lawyer