IMTIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE
Sections 2302 and 9449 were apprehended on the spot and the rifle used in the crime was secured, which the ballistic expert used to attach the suspect to the commission of the crime, provided reliable and irreversible molecular evidence. Had done. Being available, the weakness of the purpose may not be the mitigating circumstance for the lesser punishment. The accused cannot be expected to carry a rifle at the complainant's house at odd hours. The accused person was convicted, there was no basis for preventing the death penalty, as the complainant or other witnesses may not have witnessed the death sentence in view of the traumatic event. Under the circumstances, the punishment of the accused was maintained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Tall lawyer