Find a Lawyer

FAIZ-UL-HASSAN versus JAN SULTAN

Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, Recovery of separation of ex parte decree against illegal collection of money as security in Dover amount, Wife's cash. The court dismissed the earlier order. Two years after being passed by the same family court, the petitioner filed a petition against the husband but the application was allowed by the Lower Appellate Court to submit illegal money as security under the permit. Is. The husband, who was set aside, did not deposit the money and was ordered to retaliate. In the constitutional petition, the order passed against the husband was rejected, which was rejected by the High Court. Deferred Compensation Order completely ignored in challenge. The appellate court ordered the lower appellate court before the High Court for review or constitutional application before the same court and went to the Family Court without dimmer where the husband participated in the proceedings but in writing as directed by the lower appellate court. The statement was not filed, the Family Court rightly attacked her husband's defense and passed the verdict. In order to recover the money, both the lower courts and the High Court upheld the Family Court's order to collect the indoor money before seeking remand for the trial. how to become a advocate from Dijkot lawyer