Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMED versus STATE

Testimonies of Section 764, 533 and 537 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), sections 364, 533 and 537 of the Drug Abuse Act 1997 were sent to them for analysis, pending trial by the trial court. The rest of the quantity of ras marijuana lying with him was sent to another chemical inspector and he relied on his report in favor of conviction and sentencing. On any exception, the trial case was adjudicated by the trial court and after the receipt of the first Chemical Examiner's report, no amendment was required which was not genuine then the prosecution's version was established. It was By CRPC, the trial court was simply irregular in its own hands and since there was no prejudice to the accused and neither was charged. d and in the initial stages when the statement of the accused was recorded in the presence of a senior lawyer in this case, there was no objection. Section 333333, read with the CRPC, read under the CCPC was treatable, the accused was sentenced (PP 1254, 1255, 1256, 12681A, B, C , F and G best advocate from Sanghi lawyer