Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), Section 364 Bail, FIR grant in this case was filed two years late and the alleged kidnapper not recovered from custody. It was There was a backdrop of ill-will and bitterness among the parties as the accused had earlier lodged an FIR against the complainant's son about the commission of the unnatural crime, despite the allegations against the two accused already present. Had admitted on bail. Although the allegations against the co-accused complainant are suspected of serious involvement in the case, he has admitted that he has no suspicion of such involvement. One of the accused's criminal case remained on physical remand and it was stated that during the remand, the alleged abductor was not recovered. During the remand, the accused was not in the custody of the accused and no clue was found. Yes, continued detention of the accused in the jail was not likely to provide assistance in the recovery of the kidnappers who sought further investigation against the accused, he was admitted bail property advocate from Sukkur lawyer