Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAMO KHAN versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Rr 16 (4), 17 and 18 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Declaration of Declaration of Declaration Form, the applicant was the candidate for the post of nominee for absence of nomination papers and the deputy returning officer. Was accepted. Their papers were nominated but the District Returning Officer rejected it on the basis of not submitting the Declaration Form under Sindh Local Government Election Rules, 2 (00, JR 16 (4)) where the applicant had registered the nomination. The District Returning Officer was rightly rejected by the order, did not face any illegal or improper sanction by the District Returning Officer and the High Court refused to intervene in the same constitutional petition. , Was excluded under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.