Find a Lawyer

RAJINDHAR KUMAR versus VIJAY KUMAR

Section 1 561 An Exploratory Code (X, V of 1860), the investigations presented by Articles 420 and 406, were disregarded and it was only after finding out that Mans Ri. Whether or not the element was present. The defendant knew whether the money was in his bank account and whether the failure to pay the check was accidental or deliberately determined the guilt or innocence of the accused in any case, depending on the case. This is only because the facts recorded during the hearing are in full force. Matters also imposed civil liability, not enough to stop the proceedings, though nothing was on record to show that civil proceedings between the parties were pending, but the continuation of the civil suit was not restricted to criminal proceedings. However, on the same subject in both cases, the accused had two remedies open to him, one to punish the accused for the fraud played by him and the other to receive money. Of which he was deprived of the accused since the accused had already committed a crime and was facing a trial before a criminal jurisdictional court, if the proceedings at that stage were to be canceled. This gives an impression of tension. High Court denied criminal proceedings using extraordinary powers to halt the process of law. jobs for fresh advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer