Find a Lawyer

HAJI AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS

Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) Informing him of the personal need of the landlord, it was stated that the landlord already had two shops in which he sewed clothes / clothing. What was the business of the tenant and no tenant was advised to rent the landlord's claim as he was running his business in the residential premises which caused other people to suffer and suffer. , It turned out to be false places. The dispute was located in a place known as the timber / timber market where no other business could be done except for work, timber sales and timber harvesting, the tenant located on the first floor of the premises. Offered to lift the proper construction. The landlord disputes his expenses for the use of the home where he can conduct his own business sewing and sewing, but the landlord did not accept his offer. The landlord admitted in cross examination that the first floor But it can be easily traded. Such denial proved the landlord's misunderstanding of the landlord, in the circumstances, failing to prove that a dispute was required by him. His personal use of his personal status and his removal request on this basis was rejected famous supreme court advocate from Morgah lawyer