MUHAMMAD BAKHSH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAHIMYAR KHAN
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application After presenting evidence of the plaintiff's affidavit for specific performance of nomination, her evidence was sealed, finally and by the defendant. After the preparation of the case, the matter was adjourned for proof of the plaintiff. The rejected plaintiff filed a petition seeking the impression of a thumb rather than a finger print expert, instead of presenting evidence in rebellion, with the petition dismissed by the trial court as well as the appellate court. That is, the court's coordination order filed by the plaintiff has rejected the plea filed by the plaintiff following that the case was filed to extend the proceedings filed by the plaintiff because the courts The arguments given were based on the facts of the case in any jurisdiction of the court order. In the absence of, a provocative request against orders to serve false orders was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Blitang lawyer