PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus FAZAL AHMAD
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 118 Para 4, 5, 6 and 8 Property owners of privately-run private schools claimed that their father rented a portion of their house to run the school But the authority did not pay rent or they were given possession of the house. The Authority claims that the school remains owned by the Authority. It is not a matter of authority only, the administration and the operation of such college or school is with the provincial government, the title of the property in which the schools are run will remain and its owners remain. The property owner had gifted the property or dedicated it to the provincial government. The authority claims that the school owned by the e-authority was rightfully rejected by the national-owned school.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Faisalabad lawyer
