ABDUL MAJEED LODHI versus RETURNIGN OFFICER
Section 13, 14 and 18 Punjab Local Government Election Rules of Constitution Pakistan 1973, 2000, 9, 10, 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitution Petition Nomination Papers Nomination papers were rejected on the basis of this number The above papers were wrongly mentioned in the ward when a candidate was requested to rectify his error, but the Returning Officer rejected it and the candidate's papers were rejected. Were, under this, the Order of Returning Officer retained on appeal. The District Returning Officer was the same as the Returning Officer (right thumb and wrong number) for both wards and misinterpretation of ward number was only a Moolvi error, in the circumstances, correction should be allowed, especially when praying in it. Respect was bestowed by the candidate over time. For all purposes the nomination papers were a request and should be considered as h. Any other pleading and scientific error or false document in the application should be allowed to be independently corrected by the courts in its constitutional jurisdiction. Without authorization, the orders of the Returning Officer and the District Returning Officer were fixed and the candidate was given the correct number of wards in his nomination papers.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Dadakhel lawyer