Find a Lawyer

M. SULEMAN versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Appeal against the decision of Articles 9, 10 and 16 of the Ordinance 1997, the Banking Court upheld the decision of the suit which required the lender to deposit and pay a certain amount. Commands. The rest is in twelve monthly installments. The borrower filed a petition before the Banking Court demanding that the remaining amount be received in twenty-four equal installments instead of twelve which was rejected by the Banking Court and the borrower filed an appeal against this order, The court, which admitted that the court failed to hand over the overdue installments to any law-enforcing court for payment in twelve equal monthly installments, no matter, under the circumstances, before the banking court. Was not delayed and was told that due to the fact that the court was affidavit, he rightly applied Was deleted Lenders cannot be interfered with in the absence of any illegal interference in the banking court order. divorce advocates from Theing Jattan More lawyer