Find a Lawyer

MAKHAN JAN versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMAU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD

Section 18 B&43 (6) Pakistan (Administration for Vacant Property) Rules, 1950, R17 (3) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Conciliation Act, 1959, Section 3 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Fifteen years after the approval of the aforesaid rights to the allottee through the application for review before the Section 42 custody, the termination of the property before the approval of the proprietary rights in respect of the land allotted to the allotment shall be subject to the custodian's limitations and The Custodian's High Court order was upheld because of the restriction of the order and the High Court was challenged in this case before the Supreme Court. Or was it that Custodian has no obligation to submit a review because there is no limit. Proposed to file the petition / review before the proprietary rights of the persons allotted in connection with the dispute, it was twice challenged in the Supreme Court if different persons, but supported in favor of the same appellant, were allowed to reside in the same village. There was a resident in whom this property was located so it could be delayed because they have no knowledge of the allotment and execution of the property rights in favor of the allotment. But they couldn't. Under section 3 of the Administration of Laws Act 1959 in Jammu and Kashmir, a 30-day ban period was set for filing a review application before the Code of Conduct in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Fifteen years after the application was filed, the ceiling was declared as good .a jobs for fresh advocates from Khair Pur lawyer