LRSHAD AHMED MALIK versus STATE
Section 9 (b) of the Controlled Drugs Act, 1997, police officers were to praise the evidence of heroin recovery and no information was sought by the police party to link the two respected counselors to the recovery process. Was done It was reported by the police whether the accused was selling heroin, which was illegal, the prosecution did not record the relevant entry in the police diary regarding the raiding party leaving the raiding party. The chemical investigator's report on the quantum of heroin prosecution case led to the raid of the accused, which took advantage of the suspect's suspicion of illegal acts and material contradictions. Bad in the situation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer
