Find a Lawyer

WAHID BAKHSH versus NOOR AHMAD

After the conversion of the case, the value of the case was fixed at Rs 2,60,000 and after transferring the declaration and injunction in the suit for special performance to the jurisdiction of section 9 of the Ordinance 1962 of the West Pakistan Courts. He was directed to collect fees from the court. Appeal was allowed using the money and then its appellate jurisdiction, and the appellate court was ordered to prosecute for the correct performance of the contract, failing to consider whether its appellate jurisdiction was in fact Is limited to Rs. 50,000 and even after amending the Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, the High Court Lower Appellate Court has jurisdiction over the matter in respect of matters worth more than Rs. 250,000. Was fully qualified to do so if a declaration and injunction case could be converted into a suit for specific performance of the contract. As soon as the Court settled the jurisdiction to decide the specific performance of the contract and related matters, the lower appellate court had reached that conclusion, as the court fixed the suit property value at Rs 2,60,000. The court should have referred the case to the trial court for deciding the matter. The appeal was dealt with by the lower appellate court, the jurisdiction of the trial court was increased from Rs. 50,000, therefore, the trial court had the authority to fully empower all the cases with jurisdiction and jurisdiction. Could upset the appeal before. Illegal, invalid and any cause for specific performance of the lower appellate court contract and occupation before the High Court decision. law websites from Bhuawana lawyer