Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DAD versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

Sections 302/109, 337F (ii) and 337F (iii) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), were upheld by the Supreme Court for consideration, even though the High Court disputed it. There is a verdict in which there was evidence on record. The arguments raised by both sides have neither been discussed nor will it be sustainable to analyze. Whether litigation witnesses who were admittedly injured and fully imposed on the accused can be discredited on the basis of their relationship with the deceased or considered to be of interest. Whether the evidence of the litigation was materially inadmissible and there were impossibilities in which he expressed doubt about the actual incident and thus made it untrustworthy on the basis of the arguments presented by the accused. ? What was the effect of the wounds on the accused? Whether it is the responsibility of the prosecution under the law or the responsibility of the defense to rationalize its existence on its body. Whether the motive was permanently established or shrouded in mystery and what has been, what effect the reasoning has had on the prosecution, and in the light of the position received by the prosecution, especially in the statements of some of the accused? The purpose of the expert reports, along with molecular testimony, medical evidence, recoveries and motions, was sufficient to establish the collective responsibility of all the defendants, and they need to be increased in sentencing. law websites from Khurian wala lawyer