Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ABBOTTABAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 154, 156, 169, 551 and 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 452 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 22 Inquiry Report The Senior Superintendent of Police directed the Inspector Complaint Cell at the request of the accused to inquire into the accused inspector's case in his report that the accused was found innocent and on the basis of the said report the Judicial Magistrate dismissed it and under it. The accused was sent to evacuate. Section 696969, the complainant of the CC, said that the inquiry report and subsequent orders to dismiss the accused were tried, under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no scope for the establishment of any complaint cell. No and the cell has no ability to override options. Once the case was registered under section 154, the CRCPP police charge was required to investigate it under section 156, CRPC police did not have the authority to cancel any case. Demand the court or release the accused under the CRPC, CRPC, but the police was obliged to present a full challan in the court of jurisdiction authorized to hear the accused's trial and further inquiry officer police The cell did not have the power to revoke the investigation of any criminal matter under which the officer in charge of the police station was in charge or the competent court I did not have the authority to decide the case before it appeared. list of advocates from Sita Road lawyer