ALLAH DITTA versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 561 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979); Combining the Section 10 Challan and the De Novo Trial, the trial court conducted two cases and arose after a single FIR. In the two cases, not only two separate charge sheets were prepared, but the witnesses presented by the prosecution were examined separately and there was no opportunity. The defendants in one case were provided to cross-examine witnesses in another case, such a method of effectiveness was not appropriate or the proper course of action for both cases was, according to the trial court's direction. Was not kept Novo proceeded after making an allegation based on both invoices and then proceeding to file evidence in the same case instead of running two cases in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer
