Find a Lawyer

SARDAR KHAN versus ASHIQ HUSSAIN

In the Memorandum of Complaint and writ petition filed before the Tribunal or Authority, section 44 (written), section 44 (VIII) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974), Pakistan (Administration for Evacuation Property) Act 1957 The custody of the effect was reviewed by the High Court on the ground that Custodian did not issue a notice to the maintenance authority before reviewing its order and stated that the matter was not a custodian. Was raised before nor was the failure of the writ petition to appear before the High Court in connection with the relevant tribunal or Failure to raise the point that Hartey was challenged before the point that was filed after the order, was a different case than the appellate jurisdiction, the High Court, or the Tribunal relief in exercising the writ jurisdiction. Is arbitrary in nature and it is the responsibility of the party concerned to raise the issue in support of its dispute, for example by the Tribunal or the Authority, otherwise such tribunal or authority may be found on the basis of filing a writ petition Cannot be made especially when the writ petition cannot be excluded at this point, the High Court has written Not a reason to Eric. The issue that was neither raised before the officer nor in the earlier filed memorandum, failure to issue a notice to the maintenance authority, cannot be construed as an error which could be said about the matter. Because it can be improved by the protector doing the necessary work female advocates from Turbat lawyer