Whether the Supreme Court had approved the appeal by the jirga of Article 3 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Article 6 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the jurisdiction. The order of the jirga and the Additional Assistant Commissioner through the award, affirming the appeal as well as the filing of the appeal, stood up and the entire case was re-established and will be considered pending. Whether the declaration by a High Court or the Supreme Court that a particular law has been revoked as a violation of fundamental rights does not have the legal consequences of the abrogation of such principles contained in section 6 of the General Clause Act 1897. ? , Will not be attracted; once a law has been declared infringement of any fundamental right, its decision to protect the pending action and to continue the same decision under its termination This will be like restoration and continuation of the law. What was not valid and, in the light of such provisions, the interpretation of Rozi Khan's relevant law in 1992 (SCMR 445) would not be attracted to the present matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
