Find a Lawyer

SAIMA versus ISMAIL KHAN

Dangerous Drugs Act 1930 Section 10 (2) (a) The testimony of the evidence was acknowledged by the witnesses who witnessed the recovery of opioids on the occasion of the accused, who had signed the recovery memo and had no misconduct or suspicion that he was guilty. Could have lied in the case. The evidence was not sufficiently dependent on the circumstances in which the accused's offender was retained. The eight-year prison sentence was reduced by four years to the RI given to the accused by the trial court, \ section 382b, c. RI benefit from RPC divorce advocates from Talhur lawyer