MUHAMMAD AYUB versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MULTAN
Pakistan Penal Code Section 188 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 4 (l) (h) and 195 (lj (a) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 18 Constitutional Disobedience of Order Imposed by Government Employee) (Complaint for filing of the FIR) Sections 4 (1) (h) and 195 (1) (a), in this case by the District Magistrate or by his superior, the Secretary of the Interior, in this case Should have been filed under the CRPC and a subsidiary office. The District Magistrate was not, in any case, capable of filing an F1R against the accused; therefore, sealing his business premises without any jurisdiction and legal authority was a fundamental violation. Under Article 18 of the Constitution, he was given the right to be accused of being permanently authorized to do business, the District Magistrate's order being set at $ 144, the CTPC applied to his case. There was no apparent police duty but the face of the record was also mentioned as the son of the accused at the age of five because one of the accused in the FIRFR was in control of the situation. Accordingly a constitutional application was granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
