Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus PATHANI

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 and Article 113 The specific performance of the demarcation agreement by the two courts below the date of registration of the cell deed mentioned in the agreement was 30 6 1988. And it was. The plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the contentious agreement, the two courts together dismissing the case for the specific performance of the contract which was ruled under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which thus The time limit for counting of cases was provided. The suit was filed on the 28th 1996 to the date of execution of the agreement and the search was banned at the same time, both the courts were based on the proper definition of factual evidence. Failed to disclose or has judicial errors. The decisions of the two courts below the High Court refused to intervene ask a advocate free from Nankana Sahib lawyer