Find a Lawyer

ALI BUX versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 5 365A / evidence evidence Definition of evidence The prosecution failed to examine the material witness present in the court by which the robbers were paid and no explanation was provided for such default. And their statements were not questioned. It did not say under Section 342, CRPC that he had released the abductor after receiving ransom through his testimony through Victim's statement that he had identified the accused in the identity parade, Nor did he assign any role to the accused during the identification parade. During the commission of this crime, he was played even by the Assistant Mukhtarkar, after an unspecified six-day break, which the identity parade was not capable of complying with the same complaint to the police immediately. Did not report to the commission. Serious crime, but he did so after recovering the victim, who questioned his behavior and took advantage of the doubt and got him out of the situation. patent advocate from Hayatabad lawyer