Find a Lawyer

LAL HUSSAIN versus SADIQ

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) law martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 124 A person inheriting Islamic law was not heard for seven years, considered under Article 124 of the testimony of the law, according to the 1984 concept. Because of the death of such a person, a seven-year period of accountability was the real brother of the applicant and forerunner in the interests of the defendants and has not been heard since 1944 in the interest of the defendant. He died in 1974 and the applicant was the sole legal claimant, the heirs of the owner of the suit property suit tiled by the applicant were decided by the trial court and This decision has been upheld by the Lower Appellate Court High Court, which, under the jurisdiction of the review, has set aside the decision of the competent lower appellate court where the petitioner has claimed. The sole legal heir of the suit property, the applicant was obliged to prove through positive evidence that the owner had died after his brother, in whose interest he was the predecessor, contained his own statement of the respondents included by the applicant. Which was very bald and controversial which cannot be termed as positive evidence about the owner's death date, in the absence of positive evidence about the owner's death date, seven years, coupon evidence, Article 124 of 1984 was to be calculated from the disputed year of the owner's disappearance, ie the legacy of the J974 owner was opened in 1954. That was when the forefront of respondents' interests was alive. And in that case, the defendants and the predecessor were discussed, in which case the High Court ruled in the interest of the defendants, so law firms from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer