Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION versus MUHAMMAD SAID

Land acquisition Act 1894 Sections 4, 23 (2) and 54 Appeals were obtained through notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, granting the land to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Outgoing compensation was declared controversial. Appellant was awarded compulsory acquisition charges at a rate of 25 of annually. The appellant was that the acquisition notice was issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and was a provision of section 23 (2) of the said Act. Not applicable to the present case where the appellants were not included as a company when the notification was issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the provisions of section 23 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act. Could not seek, the company incorporated as appellant under the provisions of the 1894 Company Ordinance, 1084, would not work as a rotor, the landlords could not be given the mandatory acquisition rights. Under Section 23 (2) of the Award, the respondents / owners are required to acquire "company" under consideration of 25 compulsory acquisition charges. Soul charges were not justified. The Supreme Court set aside the landlords lawer from fb area from Jamrud Road lawyer