Find a Lawyer

ROHEELA versus MAZHAR ALI SHAH

Gifts to Articles 122 and 123 of the Property Act, 1882, objected to the claim of the gift in respect of the property given by the husband to the wife, even though the gift was given by the husband to his wife. The delivery of the property will prove to be valid and in the absence of any such evidence the gift cannot be admitted to be valid where the property was gifted by the husband to his wife, at that time the control and management of the property was special. But when it is not necessary the donor was in the husband's hands and the gift would be understood by the logical region behind the delivery of the possession, The goal was to make sure that the gift property could be set up and that, by registering the donor gift process and then confirming the mutation on the basis of the registered process, it would be time to consider all the donors themselves. Suitable for Excluding yourself in the form of a gift will not be illegal when the delivery of the occupation is invalid where there is a way to perform it, because the possession of the donor after the gift is considered by the father if the change of possession is complete. If the text was made in the same gift process. advocates from Chaman lawyer