Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the trial court, without assigning the status of a public servant and the nature of the transaction and the offense, had jurisdiction on the basis of the allegations. The commission was neither a public servant nor a government property involved in the crime of misappropriation of private funds by a person who has come under the appreciation of a public servant. There will be no trial by a special judge, under the anti-corruption offense confession. It was The accused was also received money in Azad Kashmir for the purpose of interrogating the migrants belonging to Azad Kashmir, in the territorial jurisdiction of Azad Kashmir and consulting services in Azad Kashmir, therefore, could not be made a criminal case. The FIA filed a case against the accused in Rawalpindi and the challan of the case could not be presented. The Special Judge (Central) in Rawalpindi claimed that the accused would be treated as a government employee on the basis of the post of Director Advisory Service. The service was set up by the federal government without any documentary evidence. It is sufficient to have the Advisory Service, a non-governmental organization, a government organization, or a citizen of Azad Kashmir as a civil servant in an independent Kashmir, or a court established by a court not to be heard It was alleged by the federal government of Pakistan that it had gone bad advocates from Mansehra lawyer