Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HASSAN versus JAMSHAID ALI

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 Section 24 Pre-Impression Money (ZAR-E-SOM), filing a trial court's emission to pass an order for such submission The Impact Trial Court dismissed the pre-emptor's case on the ground that it was vacant. The amount due was not deposited within 30. The days of filing an appeal before the lower appellate court were also dismissed on the same basis. The High Court allowed the second appeal and the trial court remanded the trial court on account of which the trial court pre-empted the deposit. Failed to approve any order in the order. Wanted under section 24 of the Punjab Pre-Breach Act of 1991, the trial court cannot avoid saying that no one from the tile party has paid any attention to the court's mandatory supply of section 24 of the Punjab Permission Act 1991. It is the duty of the trial court to pass the order under section 24 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act of 1991 after filing a case. In order to deposit the same amount, the sale price of the suit property in cash. Such period as may be prescribed shall not be more than 30 days after the submission of the suit where the provision of the Act was compulsory in nature, the order of the deposit shall not be complied with. The trial court failed to comply with the provisions contained in section 24 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1990, and its order demanded that it submit a third part of the sale price within two days. The order was stringent because it was scarcely a day to comply, so considering the amount that was to be deposited, the Supreme Court ruled that the trial court was guilty of negligence, ignoring such procedure. best law firm from Rashidabad lawyer