Find a Lawyer

AZAD versus STATE

The testimony of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) was not examined by the prosecution of two witnesses, including one injured, while another injured witness did not support the prosecution case. The complainant and the other witness were of interest and their evidence Was also not confirmed. There was no recovery from the possession of the accused motif by the injured eye witness or an independent source. Only the co-accused was assigned the prosecution, but the prosecution failed to examine the independent witnesses of the incident, though the death sentence was unforgivable. The Independent Evidence Role was essentially wanted Ocular evidence was not only tainted, but also filled with material contradictions and misconceptions, the non-examination of the material witnesses by the prosecution had impaired the trial, the circumstances of the accused I was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. criminal advocate from Malakand lawyer