Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SAMAD KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P

Sections 4, 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Sections 122 and 123 Acquisition of a Land Gift, Appellant's assertion claimed ownership over the land acquired in dispute on the land. Was that the land was gifted. The gift was owned by his grandfather through conversion and he was entitled to receive the compensation as the owner of the land. Respondents also claimed ownership of the land in dispute over the land that their father had purchased through a grandfather's sale. Revenue records did not disclose legally enforceable and variable land in later Jambandis and the land was never occupied by appellant / allegedly because appellant's name was not listed in the measles cultivation column. Was one of the essential ingredients for establishing the right gift respondents, on the other hand was born quite unconscious on the record to prove that the sale was done by his son's grandfather and It was exchanged regularly and was later included in the Jamabandis, The district was also transferred to the shopkeeper and the respondents were not only the owners, but spent huge sums on construction of the land on the dispute, but also disposed of some of the respondents' alleged gift mutation in connection with the land dispute. , Even if it is believed that the donor was subsequently terminated, the same was not effected in the Revenue Record, and the possession was not transferred to the appellants, in the circumstances, inappropriate. Was declared famous high court advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer