Find a Lawyer

SUB-MAJOR (RTD.) MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, FAUJI FOUNDATION, RAWALPINDI

Completion of Section 2A & 4 Appeal of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Appellants whose services were terminated on corruption charges after a full inquiry challenged their dismissal before the Service Tribunal Employer Foundation, which specifically armed Pakistan. Was intended for the welfare of veterans. , Their families, wives, and Shahid's children run in the private sector and all the costs of their various welfare activities are always met by funds received through their own industrial and commercial projects and received from the Federal or Provincial. No financial support was received. The Government Foundation was an illegal organization and the Foundation and the Appellant did not belong to the Master and the Employer Foundation, which was owned or controlled by the Federal Government, the components required under Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973. There were too many missing employees. Could not enjoy the status of public servants, lacking the jurisdiction to decide the appeal filed by the appellant for the purpose of the Services Tribunals Act 1973 and the Service Tribunal. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Samma Satta lawyer